(x)국제연대 관련자료

Kudankulam and Nuclear Safety



Kudankulam and nuclear safety
October 21, 2011
Alexandr Yemelyanenkov, RIR

Armenians and Lithuanians are among those most surprised at an unwarranted flare-up of
anti-nuclear protests in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu. Although it was in Armenia that the
population suffered for six years from power shortages, and in Lithuania two problem-free
power units were shut down for no apparent reason.

Kudankulam and nuclear safety

The Kudankulam atomic power project has become a hub of protesters of all stripes

The ancient town of Metsamor in the Caucasus, near the site of the active Armenian Nuclear
Power Plant, lies thousands of miles away from the construction site of the Kunadkulam
Nuclear Power Plant in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu. But it’s with bewilderment and sympathy
that the residents of Metsamor, just like many others in Armenia, Belarus, Lithuania, Russia,
and Ukraine, have learned that the almost finished energy facility, badly needed for the region’s
development, has become hostage to environmentalist politicking and to gullible yet
misinformed locals.

Instead of celebrating the successful completion of a Russian-Indian project in this hi-tech field,
attempts at sinking it have been made under the guise of populist slogans, burying years of
efforts by thousands of Indian and Russian construction workers, engineers, designers, and
scientists, to say nothing of billions of rupees invested in this promising venture.

“I wouldn’t try to second-guess why this is happening and who stands to benefit from it,” said
Vladimir Grachev, a prominent environmental expert who spent years as head of the Ecology
Committee of the Lower Chamber of Russia’s Parliament. “But all of this is very reminiscent of
the political passions that swept across the former Soviet republics in the late 1980s. The
Armenian NPP was shut down in 1989 for political reasons…”


“We all know very well and are sorry about the tragedy that happened in Japan,” Russian Prime
Minister Vladimir Putin said during a recent visit to China. “But we all understand very well that
such countries as China or, for instance, Russia cannot do without nuclear power. Therefore
our mission is not to get scared and shut down everything; it is rather to use the most advanced
technology that would exclude any possibility of an adverse turn of events.”

“We have completed stage one of the Tyanvan Nuclear Power Plant, with work having been
done to the highest world standards and using the latest technology both in terms of efficiency
and safety. We have built a test fast-neutron reactor nine months ahead of schedule. And I
would like to say that this is the most advanced equipment, the most advanced technology…”


Keep in mind that this is the plant that had withstood the magnitude 7 Spitak earthquake a year
before, with its operability remaining fully intact. Yet it was unable to withstand political
campaigning, falling victim to power struggles and electioneering.

“For six years the population of Armenia and the entire post-Soviet Trans-Caucasus region
suffered from power shortages,” continues Grachev. “ They ended up cutting trees in the
streets and breaking up furniture for firewood, like during the Leningrad blockade in wartime.”
Eventually, a majority of people voted to restart the power plant. It was brought back online in
1995 with assistance from Russian nuclear experts, and is now generating around 40% of
Armenia’s total electricity output. This past June, after the Fukushima, IAEA experts conducted
a thorough inspection of the Armenian NPP and recommended extending its service life.

Unfortunately, the anti-nuclear rallies of the 1980s have made their mark on Russia itself.
Construction of several nuclear power and heat plants was suspended or discontinued
altogether. Bringing them back to life 10 or 15 years after required a lot of additional public
spending. Thankfully, Russia has proved capable of doing this. But take the Bulgarian
government, which to this day hasn’t been able to raise financing to resume construction of the
Belene NPP, which was sabotaged at a very early stage. However, they are determined to see
this project through.

At another Bulgarian NPP, the Kozlodui, built by the Russians, political pressure has led to
premature shutdown and withdrawal from service of two perfectly operable VVER-440 power
generation units. Similar units have been running problem-free at the Paks NPP in Hungary
and at nuclear power plants in the Czech Republic. Two exactly similar units at Finland’s
Loviisa NPP are considered to hold the record in both the length of accident-free service and
economic efficiency.

Sensible politicians in Vilnius are also speaking today of the need to learn from others’
mistakes. There’s a sincere feeling of regret there over succumbing to pressure from the
European Union and shutting down two problem-free power units at the Ignalina NPP without
any apparent reason. Now Lithuania has to buy much more expensive electricity from the EU
and has been begging them in vain for an affordable loan… to build a new nuclear power plant
at home. It already has a site and a name – the Visarginas; what’s unclear is who, when, and
under which design – Japanese, American, or French – will build it or how to pay for it.


“Under the present circumstances, the problem is not only that huge amounts of money have
been spent on the project (with total expenditures topping 131 billion rupees.) This nuclear
power plant has become the largest investment project in that country’s history. The plant’s
launch would have a direct impact on the development of manufacturing and services in Tamil
Nadu, one of India’s most developed regions steadily ranking third or fourth in terms of
industrial production. Electric power consumption there has increased by a factor of 1.4 over
the past six years, with the shortfall (including rationing and denial of new user connections)
reaching 5% and rising to 10–12% during the peak hours.”

Sergei Kondratyev,

Expert, Institute of Energy and Finances Foundation


According to the World Nuclear Association, “it’s perfectly clear now that long before that time,
the Baltic NPP, already under construction in Russia’s Kaliningrad Region, will come online in
this energy-hungry part of Europe.”

Both the Baltic and the Kudankulam NPPs are totally different in terms in their design and
execution from the generation of nuclear power plants that include the natural disaster-ravaged
Fukushima. The Russian project enjoys the unquestionable advantage of a fitting combination
of active safety systems and advanced technical solutions based on “passive” protection
principles. These solutions that have already been implemented in the first two power units of
the Kudankulam bring them as close as possible to fourth-generation projects in terms of the
“overall likelihood of a significant damage to the active zone.”

What’s more, the Kudankulam project takes the region’s specifics into account as much as
possible. It uses time-tested technology, components, and systems and draws upon the
experience of designing, manufacturing, and operating other power plants with water-to-water
reactors. It also makes an allowance for the peculiarities of the local tropical ocean waters that
contain large quantities of sea plants, shellfish, and marine fauna. The Kudankulam’s hydro
technical facilities perform a rather wide range of functions and comprise custom-developed
fish protection systems.

Last but not least, the Nuclear Power Corporation of India decided that, given the arid climate
and the needs of the local developed agriculture, the plant wouldn’t be consuming water from
the local lakes but would rather be self-sufficient in terms of fresh water supply. The
Kudankulam design thus comprises a seawater desalination system.

By the way, “big waters” from the Indian Ocean once came dangerously close to the shore
where the power plant is located. It was behind the Kudankulam’s dependable breakwaters that
the local population was hiding back then. Is the human memory span really that short?




(x)국제연대 관련자료의 최신글

댓글 남기기